Friday, July 29, 2011

Caroline Glick Replies

Great essay from Caroline Glick:

Aside from Kaczynski, (whom he plagiarized without naming), certain parts of Breivik's manifesto read like a source guide to leading conservative writers and bloggers in the Western world. And this is unprecedented. Never before has a terrorist cited so many conservatives to justify his positions.

Breivik particularly noted writers who focus on critical examinations of multiculturalism and the dangers emanating from jihadists and the cause of global jihad. He also cited the work of earlier political philosophers and writers including John Stuart Mill, George Orwell, John Locke, Edmund Burke, Winston Churchill and Thomas Jefferson.

...
As much as statements by Sevje, (or Gore, Walt, Mearshimer, Scheuer or Chomsky), may anger their ideological adversaries, no self-respecting liberal democratic thinker would accuse their political philosophies of inspiring terrorism.

There is only one point at which political philosophy merges into terrorism. That point is when political thinkers call on their followers to carry out acts of terrorism in the name of their political philosophy and they make this call with the reasonable expectation that their followers will fulfill their wishes. Political thinkers who fit this description include the likes of Muslim Brotherhood "spiritual" leader Yousef Qaradawi, Osama Bin Laden, Hamas founder Sheikh Yassin, al Qaeda in Yemen leader Anwar Awlaki and other jihadist leaders.

2 comments:

  1. Open letter to the editor of Jerusalem Post: C. Glick's "Breivik and totalitarian democrats"
    by Robert Soran on Friday, July 29, 2011 at 7:15pm

    Sir,

    I am sorry for Caroline Glick, but once more she is lying, really lying in her Column One on "Breivik and totalitarian democrats."

    She wrote that Ma'ariv asked the Norwegian ambassador Sevje "whether in the wake of Breiviks terrorist attack Norwegians would be more sympathetic to the victimization of innocent Israelis by Palestinian terrorists."

    This never was asked. The question rather was whether"Norway and its citizens did change their opinion about what the international community calls the struggle against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank?"

    In original:
    האם זה הביא לחשבון נפש אצלכם ושינה את הדעה של נורבגיה ואזרחיה לגבי מה שמכונה בקהיליה הבינלאומית המאבק נגד הכיבוש של ישראל של הגדה המערבית? קרוב לוודאי שלא. אנו הנורבגים רואים את הכיבוש כסיבה לטרור נגד ישראל. נורבגים רבים עדיין רואים את הכיבוש כסיבה להתקפות בישראל. מי שתומך בזה, לא ישנה את דעתו בגלל ההתקפה באוסלו

    This is such a perversion of the original Ma'ariv interview that I think it´s worth to be brought to court by either Ma'ariv, the embassy, or the readers of this piece of instigation that contravenes all principles of investigative and opinion journalism.

    Caroline should publicly apologize! And Jerusalem Post should publish a correcting note...

    Sincererly Yours,

    Robert M. Soran

    ReplyDelete
  2. Seems like a perfectly good paraphrase to me, Robert. No "lying" involved.

    ReplyDelete